| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HISTORY OF THE FULVIA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the history of
Lancia and its models, a very special place will always be reserved for the
Fulvia, a car of extraordinary vitality which has not only given rise to a
long series of successful versions and which has not only linked its name
with an interminable sequence of sporting successes, but which also was the
model of which the greatest number of units has been built during the course
of the first 65 years of Lancia’s existence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
spring of 1963 saw the introduction of the first Fulvia
Berlina, designed by Antonio Fessia and intended
to replace the never-to-be forgotten Appia in the small-medium engine range.
Except for its engine and its size, its general structure was reminiscent of
the Flavia. Lancia having been decidedly orientated to front wheel drive
(which was proving to be so successful on the Flavia), the new “mini” Lancia
did retain the positioning of the final drive/engine, the same type of
suspension and the braking equipment of the Flavia. With an obviously shorter
wheelbase, the track dimensions were identical to the Flavia. By doing so it
was possible to standardise many components including the constant velocity
joints, the drive shafts to the wheels and also the back axle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the other hand the
design of the engine was completely new, although it followed in the Lancia
tradition: a narrow V4 engine with twin overhead camshaft. Furthermore, the
crank case, cylinder head and sump were cast in aluminium with a cast iron
block and the crankshaft supported on three main bearings. Therefore, it had
nothing in common with the four-cylinder Appia engine, except for the
capacity of approximately 1100 cc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fulvia Berlina
had a very distinctive luxury styling even though the rather angular design
of the rear was the subject of much debate. Exceptional care was taken with
the interior trim and fittings, instrumentation - all perfectly in line with
the Lancia style. For as long as the car was in production, the Fulvia was
certainly the most elegant and refined modest capacity compact saloon being
built in Europe. Furthermore, even though the ruggedness of the car called
for a sacrifice in terms of weight (the power to weight ratio was 17.7 kg per
bhp), the Fulvia embodied a high degree of active and passive safety. It was
also a fast and brilliant car (the first series sparkled at 140 kph) and was
very economical to run: 9 litres of fuel per 100 km.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fulvia Berlina
immediately enjoyed an outstanding commercial success, although when it was
introduced, the symptoms of the economic crisis which for almost 2 years
retarded Italian expansion following a
long period of prosperity, were already being felt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the autumn of '64
at the Turin Motor Show, along with the first version, the Fulvia Berlina 2C was introduced.
It had a more highly powered engine, two twin choke carburetors, new intake
and exhaust manifolds, the compression ratio had been stepped up to 9 :1. All
resulting in a substantial increase in power in all ranges with a maximum of
71 bhp at 6000 rpm, while the maximum torque was 9.4 kgm at 4300 rpm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fulvia Berlina 2C
also offered other mechanical improvements: improved gear box and final drive
ratios, so that the maximum speeds in the individual gears were increased.
Furthermore, a new type of clutch control, of the flexible mechanical type
instead of using the rigid linkage; the steering was higher geared; there was
an improvement in the front suspension; a new brake pump was fitted which had
separate feed cups (less strain on the pedal, shorter stopping times). Also
improvements were made to the body, shape of the seats, heating and
ventilating equipment and instrumentation. In this way, the Fulvia became
even more complete and sparkling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|